Fedora Update Error with KEY invalid!

今早升级Fedora 7时发现下面的错误，
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8
Public key for elfutils-0.129-1.fc7.i386.rpm is not installed
显然由于有人用了RAWHIDE的KEY签字了elfutils包导致证书链无法通过认证！ID 30c9ecf8的KEY应该来自RAWHide,而不该出现在Updates仓库中，如果不是很紧急的情况的话，暂时不要升级，直到维护者把这个错误更正了是比较稳妥的方法！
但是如果类似错误的情况下，比较紧急，一定需要升级，可以采取选项 –nogpgpcheck来跳过gpg check。
或者可以跳过相关没有正确证书签字的包，使用yum -x 参数来跳过相关的。

这次Fedora 7 Update的这个elfutils错误还可以参见这里的讨论！

Comments

Eduardo Waghorn said…
有趣的地方... 问候从智利, 南美洲。拜访我如果您要, 我敬佩非常中国文化, 并且我讲一点您的语言。拥抱。
Aug 30, 2007, 7:42:00 AM
kiilerix said…
Google translates this to:

At 7:00 upgrading Fedora found the following error,
Warning : rpmts_HdrFromFdno : Header V3 DSA signature : NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8
Public key for elfutils - 0.129 - 1.fc7.i386.rpm is not installed
It was apparently due to the use of RAWHIDE KEY signature of elfutils packet certificate chain can not be certified! KEY 30c9ecf8 the ID from RAWHide should not Updates in the warehouse, if not very urgent situation, not to upgrade until the defenders this corrected the error is relatively safe way!
But if a similar wrong circumstances, the more urgent, we need to upgrade, we can adopt the option-nogpgpcheck to skip gpg check.
Or can skip without a proper certificate related to the signature packets, use yum-x parameters related to skip.
Aug 30, 2007, 7:04:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Freeware Software Top 300 from winAddons.Com!

来自winAddons.Com的推荐，最好的300款免费软件，其中当然不乏Open Source的品牌产品，如OpenOffice，Firefox等，也包含了Windows平台下常用的不花钱的玩意儿，如Adobe Acrobat Reader等。 全文摘录如下， 对我个人经常使用和熟悉的一些产品进行了评价！！ Office 办公软件 OpenOffice - 最著名的免费的办公套件 PC Suite 602 - office suite AbiWord - text editor Atlantis Nova - text editor Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer - power point files viewer Adobe Reader - pdf reader Foxit PDF Reader - pdf reader PDFCreator - 优秀的PDF制作引擎，用于直接打印到PDF文件 Doc Convertor - document convertor Convert - unit convertor Converber - unit convertor Sunbird - calendar/organizer EssentialPIM Free - calendar/organizer PhraseExpress - speed up your writing ATnotes - create notes on the desktop Archive managers 压缩文件管理器 7-Zip - 最流行的免费压缩工具 IZArc - compression program TugZIP - compression program CabPack - compression program Universal Extractor - extract files from any type of archive Internet 因特网 Firefox - 火狐，火狐 Internet Explorer - web browser Maxthon - web browser Opera - web browser Avant Browser - web browser Thu...
Read more

What is DevOPS?

Image
What is DevOPS? As be a DevOPS engineer more than five years in the past, I was always asked what is DevOPS or what is a DevOPS role or what should a DevOPS Engineer do? Or even question like how to be a good DevOPS? What? How? should be the most two frequently questions from almost all organizations. As I am working with  Amazon Web Service  for a long time with my DevOPS career, I tried to get answers from AWS guys frist as they have a special section about AWS DevOPS, also they have AWS DevOPS certificate cources, even though I never try such cources. This is the first page said about DevOPS on AWS DevOPS to answer "What is DevOPS?", DevOps is the combination of cultural philosophies, practices, and tools that increases an organization’s ability to deliver applications and services at high velocity: evolving and improving products at a faster pace than organizations using traditional software development and infrastructure management processes. This speed enable...
Read more

RPM Build Tips!

Now, I am trying to build a Linux system based on the Fedora Core Release! Working with the RPM system in deep.The unpackaged file terminate the build process under RPM 4.x! Unpackaged files message in RPM-4.1 and following RPM version 4.1 and following demonstrate a new behaviour in the rpmbuild process. Previously, a build process might place any number of files, say in the %install stanza, when running the make install part of a Makefile , in the customary /var/tmp/%{name}-root/ BuildRoot (the RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). Once through that part of the Makefile , it can then completely ignore these files in the %files binary packaging stanza. This often happens when an upstream maintainer adds, or deletes items from new directory spurs in the make install , and the change might be missed during an unattended or automated rebuild. This option permits careful packagers to cross check the quality of their packaging. So as a cross check, /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is now enabled during ...
Read more